[technology circle]

Yu Chengdong responded to being called Yu Dazui.

According to reports, in the latest CCTV "Meet Big Coffee" program, Yu Chengdong, CEO of Huawei terminal BG, responded that he was called "Yu Dazui" by netizens, saying that bragging is not to leave a way out for himself, not to be modest, but to have a goal to draw everyone. Tianyancha App shows that "Yudazui" has been registered as a trademark by an electronic technology company in Dongguan and a trading company in Shijiazhuang. The two trademarks were applied in September 2019 and November 2020, respectively. The international classification is advertising sales and convenience food. At present, they have all been registered successfully.

Microsoft and the London Stock Exchange Group reached a 10-year cooperation agreement and will acquire a 4% stake.

According to foreign media reports, Microsoft and the London Stock Exchange Group have reached a 10-year strategic partnership agreement on the next generation data and analysis and cloud infrastructure, and will acquire about 4% of the latter. Microsoft announced on Monday that it would acquire the shares held by a consortium composed of Blackstone and Thomson Reuters. Scott Guthrie, Microsoft’s executive vice president in charge of cloud and artificial intelligence, will be appointed as a director. (Interface)

Internet

Taobao opens digital RMB payment in batches.

On the afternoon of December 12th, a column of "Digital RMB" was added to the Taobao APP commodity settlement page, and users can choose digital RMB for settlement during the transaction. At present, this function is being opened to consumers in batches. It is reported that Taobao’s digital RMB settlement function is mainly realized by downloading the new version of the digital RMB APP, opening the wallet and binding Alipay. (Cailian)

Dingdang Express Medicine responded to the online rumor that "medicine is not sold": all medicines must be accepted and put into storage before they can be sold.

On the evening of December 12, @ Dangdang Express Medicine issued a document saying that according to the relevant provisions of the Drug Administration Law, all drugs must be accepted and put into storage before they can be sold; The consumer broke into the store because he was in a hurry to buy medicine, but the store was unable to sell him because it was preparing for warehousing before business. The consumer was emotional and filmed the video and uploaded it to various online platforms. Dingdang Kuaiyao said that in view of the current shortage of epidemic prevention-related drugs, the company is actively docking with major upstream manufacturers, making every effort to increase drug procurement and supply, and doing its best to ensure drug supply.

SF responded that "the system crashed": it was verified that the system was abnormal and has now returned to normal.

On December 12th, Weibo, the official of SF Express Group, issued a document saying that some users’ SF Express clients were slow to place orders, which was verified as abnormal system. After emergency repair, they have now returned to normal, and we are deeply sorry for the inconvenience.

"Tencent meeting collapsed" rushed to the hot search, official response: network problem.

On December 12th, "Tencent meeting collapsed" rushed to the hot search. In this regard, Tencent Conference responded in Guanwei: Due to network failure, some users’ membership was affected. At present, the service has been restored, causing inconvenience. I am very sorry.

JD Health launches Internet fever clinic.

On December 12th, JD Health upgraded the "Epidemic Prevention Care Clinic" area, and launched the "Fever Clinic" service, providing users with 7×24 hours of consultation, prescription, drug purchase, medication guidance and other services related to Covid-19 infection. (Securities Times)

[Car ring]

Geely declined to comment on the news that its company Krypton has applied for an IPO in the United States.

On December 12, it was reported that Geely’s high-end electric vehicle brand Kyk-kyung had applied for an IPO in the United States, and planned to raise more than $1 billion, and Kyk-kyung sought a valuation of more than $10 billion, which would be the first large Chinese company listed in the United States for more than a year and a half. In this regard, Geely Automobile officials declined to comment on the Shanghai Securities Journal reporter. (SSE)

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited subsidiary shares in Chery Holdings.

Recently, Chery Holding Group Co., Ltd. has undergone industrial and commercial changes, and its shareholders have added Ningbo Meishan Bonded Port Area Winning Investment Co., Ltd., with a shareholding ratio of 3.73%. The reporter inquired about the industrial and commercial information and found that the company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited. However, as of press time, neither Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited nor Chery responded to this changes in equity.

Weilai’s 300,000th mass production car rolled off the assembly line.

According to Weilai Guanwei, the 300,000th production car of Weilai rolled off the assembly line at Weilai Second Advanced Manufacturing Base on December 12th.

Withdraw from the China market? Skoda’s response: No decision has been made.

Recently, foreign media reported that Skoda Automobile, a Czech automobile manufacturer owned by audi ag, is considering withdrawing from China and will make a final decision next year. In this regard, Skoda said that the company has not yet made any decision on the necessity of adjusting its strategy. (Zhongxin Jingwei)

It is reported that Toyota will outline the strategic adjustment of electric vehicles to suppliers in the next three years.

Reuters reported on December 12th that Toyota Motor Corporation is expected to outline its strategic adjustment of electric vehicles to major suppliers by early next year. Toyota’s strategic changes may include postponing some electric vehicle development projects originally planned for three years. (Interface)

[Big consumption]

For every 10 shares, 10 yuan and Gree Electric plan to pay dividends of over 5.5 billion yuan in the medium term.

Gree Electric announced that the net profit in the first half of this year was 10.13 billion yuan, and the profit available to shareholders was 5.96 billion yuan. It is planned to distribute a cash dividend of 5.54 billion yuan to all shareholders for every 10 shares (including tax).

[Financial Street]

Xiamen International Bank’s Response to "Consideration of HK$ 1.3 billion IPO": False News

Recently, some media reported that Xiamen International Bank was reportedly considering a $1.3 billion Hong Kong IPO. In this regard, Xiamen International Bank responded that the rumors are false news. At present, Xiamen International Bank still focuses on financial services to help the real economy and seeks long-term high-quality development. The information about Xiamen International Bank is subject to the official announcement of the bank. (The Paper)

Pharmaceutical industry

N95 masks are selling well, and many companies respond to the relevant business layout.

With the popularity of N95 masks, many companies have responded to the related business layout. Among them, ENKE Medical said that N95 masks are on sale, but they may be in the state of pre-sale recently. Masks are only a part of the company’s business products. At present, the annual production capacity of masks is about 100 million, and the main business is still disposable gloves. Huaren Pharmaceutical said that N95 masks are produced, but the proportion of business is not very high, and the impact on performance may not be great.

Guizhou Bailing: Product orders are queued for delivery, and the company produces 24 hours a day.

Guizhou Bailing said that the demand for cold drugs in the country is increasing, and the market is in short supply. At present, the company’s product orders are in a state of waiting in line for delivery. In terms of sales volume, the sales volume of the company’s core products has increased significantly recently, and the sales volume of Kesu Stop Syrup and Xiaoer Chaigui Antipyretic Granules are among the top. In terms of production capacity, since October this year, the company has started full-load production. Compared with the same period last year, the production capacity of the company’s core drugs has increased to varying degrees. Among them, Miao medicine "Kesu Stop Syrup" has doubled, and its production capacity has reached 350,000 bottles/day. (The Paper)

Jiu ‘an Medical: At present, the price of antigen reagent has not changed, and it is uncertain whether to adjust the price in the future.

Recently, antigen detection reagents appear "a box is hard to find". The first financial reporter called Jiu ‘an Medical as an investor and learned that the company’s demand for antigen reagents in the near future is indeed relatively large, and the company’s output will be adjusted according to the order quantity. Regarding the price of antigen reagents, the company said that the current price has not changed. The domestic price of reagents for five people is 24.9 yuan, and it is not clear whether it will be adjusted in the future.

Abnormal operation of Chengdu Company, a subsidiary of Nuclear Gene: false disclosure of enterprise information.

According to the national enterprise credit information publicity system, Chengdu Nuclear Gene Technology Co., Ltd. was listed in the list of business anomalies by Chengdu High-tech Zone Market Supervision Administration for concealing the real situation and practicing fraud, and the date of listing was December 9, 2022. According to Tianyancha APP, the company was established in April 2017, with legal representative Zhang Hezhen and registered capital of RMB 5 million, which is wholly owned by Nucleon Gene. (Zhongxin Jingwei)

[real estate circle]

Xuhui intends to sell the property management company

On December 12th, Xuhui Holding Group announced that it intends to sell all shares of Xuhui Yongsheng Service held by the Group through bidding procedures, accounting for about 23.26% of the total issued share capital of the target company. As of the date of this announcement, Xuhui has officially invited potential bidders to bid for the relevant shares, and has started preliminary discussions on the bidding procedures, but has not yet concluded a legally binding agreement with any potential bidders.

Communication industry

The three major operators will delete the travel card user data

Today, three major operators, China Telecom, China Unicom and China Mobile, have indicated that they will delete the data related to the user’s itinerary simultaneously after the "communication itinerary card" service goes offline at 0: 00 on December 13th in accordance with relevant laws and regulations, so as to ensure the safety of personal information according to law.

More exciting content, all in the first financial APP.

　　Cctv newsIn 1999, Zhou and Zheng, who lived in zhouning county, Ningde City, Fujian Province, had an injury dispute. Zhouning county People’s Court ruled that Zheng’s behavior was excessive defense. In 2000, he was sent back for retrial by Ningde Intermediate People’s Court. Subsequently, due to doubts about the injury identification, several levels of people’s procuratorial organs maintained their decision not to prosecute.

　　After 20 years of complaint, Zhou finally ushered in a turning point on October 31st this year, and a special public hearing was held in the Supreme People’s Procuratorate. How did the 20-year case happen? What is the crux of the case? What problems can the hearing solve?

　　This is the hearing scene of a criminal appeal case in Fujian Province on October 31, 2019. Zhou and Zheng are the focus of this hearing. Two people of the same age were completely changed in their lives because of a case that happened nearly 20 years ago. After many years, for the first time, they sat down and solved the problem face to face in this way. What kind of dispute happened in that year? Why did the Supreme People’s Procuratorate hold a hearing of such a scale and handle Zhou’s complaint by public examination? It starts with a dispute that happened in 1999.

　　Zhou helped a friend to discuss that he was hit by Zheng throwing stones.

　　At that time, Zhou and Zheng were both 25 years old, living in zhouning county, Ningde City, Fujian Province, and didn’t know each other. On the evening of December 4, 1999, because of the emotional breakdown with his girlfriend, Zheng went to his girlfriend’s house with his family to deal with the dispute, and had an argument with the social youth Ruan and others present, and then there was a physical conflict.

　　On the other hand, Zou was angry, but at about 9 o’clock that night, he called Zhou and several other friends, a total of more than 10 people, and planned to go to Zheng to discuss it.

　　The photos of the scene in that year showed that there were three floors in Zheng’s building, and scattered bricks could be seen on the ground of the second floor corridor. According to the police’s on-site investigation record, the wall of Zheng’s outer courtyard is 2.6 meters high, and there are traces of climbing and stepping at a distance of 2 meters from the ground. Zheng’s mother recalled that there was more than one person who climbed the wall and tried to break into her house.

　　Zhou said that he did not participate in climbing the wall at that time, but stood outside the door all the time. Seeing bricks falling, he hid in an alley.

　　That night, Zhou was treated in the county hospital and was later identified as seriously injured by the forensic doctor of the county public security bureau. In September 2000, the People’s Procuratorate of zhouning county initiated a public prosecution, accusing the defendant Zheng of intentionally injuring others’ bodies and causing serious injuries, and should be investigated for criminal responsibility for intentional injury.

　　The first instance ruled that Zheng had defended himself when the two appealed.

　　In 2000, the People’s Court of zhouning county made a judgment that Zheng’s behavior was excessive defense and he should compensate Zhou for a loss of more than 15,000 yuan. However, both of them refused to accept the verdict and continued to appeal to the court.

　　The judgment of the first instance of the case shows that more than 10 people, including Zou, gathered Zhou and so on, went to the defendant Zheng’s house at 9: 00 pm, threw bricks and stones into the corridor on the second floor, and climbed the wall to enter, thus committing illegal infringement. Defendant Zheng used bricks to stop and bruise Zhou’s head, which constituted serious injury. His defensive behavior obviously exceeded the necessary limit, which was excessive defense and his behavior constituted intentional injury. However, Zhou thought that he was seriously injured, and the court sentenced the defendant Zheng too low. Zheng insisted that he was a legitimate defense and should not bear criminal responsibility.

　　The case of doubtful evidence appraisal was sent back for retrial.

　　In 2000, the case came to the Intermediate People’s Court of Ningde City. After trial, the court made a decision to "revoke the original judgment and send it back for retrial". There are three reasons: first, some witnesses’ testimonies, on-site investigation photos and other evidence have not been cross-examined in court; Second, the testimony of Xiao, the main witness, was illegal, and the witness did not appear in court. The third reason why the case was sent back for retrial is that Ningde Intermediate People’s Court, after conducting a documentary review of Zhou’s injury appraisal report, considered that the medical evidence that his injury constituted a serious injury was insufficient.

　　At that time, no one thought that these two thin pages of injury identification would affect the direction of the whole case in the future, and even lead to the inability to continue the judicial process. In December 2000, the case was sent back for retrial, and the zhouning county People’s Procuratorate re-collected evidence to supplement it.

　　It is difficult to re-identify the injury with doubtful medical records.　

　　Because the original appraisal conclusion could not be adopted, in September 2001, the People’s Procuratorate of zhouning county entrusted the First Hospital of Ningde City to re-appraise Zhou. However, after reviewing the materials, the hospital believes that "the medical record has legal effect and cannot be supplemented or changed at will afterwards" and "it is difficult to re-identify the injury in view of the doubts in the hospitalized case of the injured person".

　　After receiving the decision of non-prosecution from the county procuratorate, Zhou submitted a complaint to the county procuratorate, the municipal procuratorate and the provincial procuratorate in turn. The results of the review by several procuratorial organs were to maintain the original decision of non-prosecution.

　　The prosecutor in charge believes that Zhou’s criminal complaint case has certain complexity and particularity, and it is necessary to hold a hearing because of the strong professionalism of forensic injury identification.

　　Invite experts and lawyers to publicly hear the case.

　　On October 31, 2019, a public hearing was held in the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, and forensic doctors, lawyers, legal experts and several NPC deputies were invited to attend. Conduct a public hearing on the crux of the case, Zhou’s injury identification.

　　At the hearing, the prosecutor combed the evidence materials with detailed pictures and texts. According to the inspection certificate made by zhouning county Public Security Bureau on December 30, 1999, "Zhou’s head was injured by blunt instrument, and there was a skull base fracture, accompanied by facial and auditory nerve injury and cerebrospinal fluid leakage, as well as epidural hematoma, subdural effusion and parietal bone fracture caused by blunt instrument injury, which constituted serious injuries." It is based on Articles 41 and 44 of the 1990 edition of the Appraisal Standard for Serious Human Injury.

　　Forensic experts believe that in all the medical records of Zhou, there is only a literal diagnosis conclusion of "skull base fracture", and there is no objective medical examination support, so the injury cannot be identified accordingly.

　　What are the flaws in medical record identification and why are the authenticity in doubt?

　　The prosecutor in charge of the case noticed that even the written diagnosis conclusions in the original materials were inconsistent in many places, and it was suspected that there were supplementary changes.

　　In addition to the suspected modification of the medical records, the more critical time of Zhou’s admission and discharge is also inconsistent in many places, and even conflicts with the time of the incident.

　　The transcripts of all the parties and the results of police investigations show that the time of the incident was on the evening of December 4. Why was Zhou’s admission time registered as 11 am on the 4 th in some materials?

　　The undertaker of the original case and the undertaker of the original review case show the evidence, and after the forensic experts express their professional opinions, the hearing officers express their opinions on the facts and evidence of the case.

　　Subsequently, the host announced the adjournment and the hearing officer reviewed the case. Form a hearing comment.