city 90m²And below 90-144m² 144m²more than compare the numbers with the prior period of the same length compare to the same period of the previous year Dingji compare the numbers with the prior period of the same length compare to the same period of the previous year Dingji compare the numbers with the prior period of the same length compare to the same period of the previous year Dingji last month

=100

Same month of last year
=100 In 2015

=100

last month

=100

Same month of last year

=100

In 2015

=100

last month

=100

Same month of last year

=100

In 2015

=100

Beijing 100.2 101.2 122.5 100.2 100.4 139.4 99.7 98.4 140.6 Tianjin 99.9 100.5 134.6 100.2 99.5 128.2 100.6 101.1 125.2 Shijiazhuang 100.2 100.8 120.0 99.8 103.0 124.7 100.2 104.1 123.8 Taiyuan 100.0 108.6 114.5 101.0 108.6 113.1 100.2 106.6 109.3 Huhehot 100.9 105.0 103.4 101.1 107.1 108.6 100.3 107.5 107.2 Shenyang 100.4 111.5 116.8 100.4 111.6 114.4 100.2 111.5 112.1 Dalian 100.5 108.8 110.5 101.0 108.5 113.0 100.7 107.2 105.4 Changchun 101.5 111.2 116.7 100.9 109.1 111.3 101.1 106.2 109.7 Halbin 101.4 110.8 113.1 100.8 110.7 114.5 100.9 110.5 112.5 Shanghai 100.4 100.3 148.4 100.1 100.6 147.4 100.4 99.9 143.6 Nanjing 100.1 99.5 151.5 100.1 98.4 146.0 100.0 98.2 143.0 Hangzhou 100.0 99.2 137.4 100.1 98.9 132.2 99.8 100.0 128.6 Ningbo 100.3 105.9 124.3 100.3 104.8 120.9 100.4 105.1 119.0 Combined fertilizer 100.0 98.9 147.0 99.8 100.3 149.2 100.7 99.5 148.7 Fuzhou 99.7 97.7 128.1 99.7 98.2 128.7 100.1 98.9 127.6 Xiamen 99.9 102.5 152.6 99.9 103.0 153.1 99.8 100.9 149.0 Nanchang 100.6 108.6 127.1 100.0 106.0 123.9 99.5 106.2 122.4 Jinan 100.0 99.6 119.4 100.1 100.7 122.3 101.3 102.1 120.7 Qingdao 100.3 103.7 117.5 100.1 104.2 119.0 100.1 105.0 115.7 Zhengzhou 100.3 99.5 132.0 100.2 99.8 130.1 100.5 97.5 124.6 Wuhan 100.5 101.0 130.4 100.2 100.9 131.1 100.2 99.2 125.3 Changsha 100.4 105.6 123.0 100.0 105.9 126.5 100.5 106.6 127.3 Guangzhou 100.1 106.3 140.3 99.7 105.1 137.2 99.6 105.8 137.6 Shenzhen 99.6 97.4 144.9 99.8 97.6 146.3 100.4 95.8 146.7 Nanning 101.0 109.5 124.7 99.7 108.1 122.3 100.8 111.1 121.9 Haikou 102.7 102.8 111.3 101.8 107.9 114.9 102.6 104.0 108.7 Chongqing 100.2 112.5 120.4 100.4 109.0 117.6 100.8 107.9 116.5 Chengdu 100.6 100.9 105.9 100.3 97.8 106.3 100.6 99.1 106.5 Guiyang 101.1 111.5 116.8 101.3 110.2 116.1 101.0 109.6 113.2 Kunming 102.7 110.1 114.6 102.7 110.9 114.5 102.2 109.1 111.2 Sian 100.6 112.8 123.0 100.7 112.6 121.2 100.5 111.1 119.9 Lanzhou 100.8 105.5 109.7 100.9 106.2 109.3 100.9 104.1 107.8 Sining 101.8 106.7 108.3 101.1 106.0 106.9 100.9 104.6 105.9 Yinchuan 100.7 103.3 105.2 100.4 103.5 104.7 100.8 105.6 105.4 Urumqi 100.7 107.3 104.5 101.3 107.0 106.4 100.3 105.1 100.1 Tangshan 100.8 106.7 108.5 100.5 105.7 108.4 100.6 106.5 108.6 Qinhuang island 100.3 107.8 113.5 99.9 105.9 112.9 100.7 105.6 108.8 Baotou 101.4 108.2 106.9 100.7 104.7 104.0 101.9 106.9 104.0 Dandong 101.9 105.4 103.5 100.9 103.3 101.5 100.9 105.3 99.2 Jinzhou 100.2 102.8 95.0 100.1 101.0 98.5 100.2 103.8 100.5 Gilling 100.5 107.1 108.5 100.1 106.9 108.7 100.6 106.2 107.7 Mudanjiang 100.6 106.7 103.9 101.5 106.4 105.0 101.1 105.8 102.0 Tin free 99.9 100.0 137.2 100.2 99.2 136.7 100.2 97.5 125.6 Yangzhou 100.0 108.3 120.1 100.6 108.6 120.1 99.9 111.0 119.4 Xuzhou 100.0 110.1 120.5 100.2 109.2 119.8 100.1 109.2 120.0 Wenzhou 100.5 105.1 111.2 100.5 106.6 114.9 100.7 108.0 113.9 Jinhua 100.3 109.8 120.1 100.2 110.1 119.9 101.2 108.9 115.3 Bangbu 98.8 107.9 115.4 100.1 109.5 118.4 99.5 104.2 111.9 Anqing 100.5 105.5 114.3 100.5 105.3 112.5 100.7 103.9 111.4 Quanzhou 100.3 102.0 111.5 100.4 101.4 110.6 101.1 100.9 110.5 Jiujiang 99.9 111.0 123.0 100.2 107.7 119.3 99.8 110.1 121.5 Ganzhou 99.7 103.3 117.6 99.8 102.4 115.4 99.6 103.9 117.9 Smoke platform 100.4 107.7 111.7 100.4 108.9 116.2 100.7 106.4 110.4 Zinin 100.5 109.4 110.3 100.5 109.3 109.7 100.1 108.3 108.1 Luoyang 100.4 110.5 119.0 100.1 109.6 113.1 99.9 107.5 110.8 Pingdingshan 100.7 103.8 107.6 100.6 107.9 112.4 100.1 105.4 109.8 Yichang 100.3 107.4 112.3 100.4 109.0 114.0 100.2 107.4 114.1 Xiangyang 100.9 109.2 111.6 99.7 105.8 107.1 100.1 105.8 104.9 Yueyang 100.8 108.4 112.8 100.8 109.8 112.9 100.6 110.3 116.1 Changde 101.4 111.9 114.1 100.1 107.8 110.2 100.6 107.6 108.1 Huizhou 100.8 106.8 132.1 100.4 104.4 131.8 99.4 102.8 128.2 Zhanjiang 100.3 108.2 116.6 100.4 109.7 117.1 100.0 110.6 114.0 Shaoguan 99.3 107.0 114.9 99.9 110.0 117.0 101.6 107.8 116.0 Guilin 100.1 108.2 110.3 100.0 110.8 112.7 101.5 107.6 112.7 Beihai 99.8 113.5 118.3 99.7 113.2 116.8 99.8 110.2 115.4 Sanya 100.3 105.9 111.3 101.1 104.6 109.0 100.0 104.1 109.0 Luzhou 101.0 103.9 109.2 102.4 106.2 109.6 102.0 105.4 107.7 Nanchong 100.4 109.9 109.8 100.6 109.3 110.1 100.3 110.8 108.4 Zunyi 101.1 106.9 110.1 100.9 107.4 107.4 101.3 108.2 110.8 Dali 102.1 108.0 109.9 101.5 105.6 109.0 101.2 104.8 106.2

　　At the press conference of the National People’s Congress on the 9th, some details of the seventh round of Sino-US economic and trade consultations in Washington were mentioned.

　　"During the consultation in Washington, one day it snowed heavily in Washington, and the US government was" closed ",but the two teams continued to communicate and negotiate. The originally planned high-level consultation lasted only two days, but it was later increased to four days. During the consultation, everyone ate lunch at noon. "

　　The details are vivid.

　　This is a matter of great concern to everyone. How did the Sino-US negotiations go?

　　After tossing for a long time, I dug up a photo online and asked an insider about the situation at that time.

　　First of all, it’s a photo about a working meal.

　　It’s the following one ↓

　　At that time, Vice Premier Liu He ate an American beef burger.

　　What Wright Heze ate was Chinese chicken rice.

　　Everyone knows that there is diced chicken with eggplant in the rice.

　　What everyone doesn’t know is that there are stories in this meal.

　　In the negotiation more than ten days ago, the two teams communicated day and night, and even the meal time was not delayed.

　　The resident of the Chinese delegation is only 5 minutes away from the USTR office building at the negotiation site, and it takes at most one hour to count the time for eating.

　　On February 24, the last day of the seventh round of consultations, the pace of progress between the two sides became faster and faster.

　　I don’t even want to delay this hour.

　　So the two sides decided temporarily on the spot to order takeout in the office, eat it quickly, and then talk quickly.

　　Chinese fast food ordered by Chinese and American fast food ordered by Americans.

　　After the meal was delivered, Wright Heze expressed great interest in Chinese food and ordered a Chinese chicken rice.

　　Vice Premier Liu He is very receptive to American hamburgers. Mnuchin is also a hamburger. (Look at the photo carefully)

　　This has the details of eating at the press conference.

　　It is said that what to drink is also very particular.

　　During the whole negotiation, there were coffee, tea, other drinks and boiled water.

　　Vice Premier Liu He poured boiled water to drink, and Wright Heze saw it, which made him feel like a bosom friend.

　　Wright Heze said that he usually likes to drink boiled water and rarely touches coffee and drinks.

　　People around you often feel strange.

　　This time, seeing that Vice Premier Liu He was also drinking plain boiled water, he no longer felt strange. It is said that Vice Premier Liu He said at that time that he would not drink coffee or tea in order to maintain sustained and abundant physical fitness.

　　Coffee and tea can refresh you, but once the excitement is over, people will get tired easily, so it is better to keep physical fitness with boiled water.

　　On second thought, these details are very interesting.

　　During the major negotiations that attracted worldwide attention, the Chinese leader ate American fast food, while the American leader ate Chinese fast food. They didn’t touch coffee and drinks, but they all drank boiled water.

　　Also, look at the photos carefully. At that time, neither side was wearing a tie.

　　This is a formal foreign affairs occasion. Although it was the weekend (24th), it was a sign of closeness and friendliness not to wear a tie on a formal occasion.

　　According to people familiar with the matter, China and the United States not only have a lot in common in eating and drinking water, but also become familiar with each other in the confrontation, releasing more goodwill. The two sides have reached more and more consensus and are pushing the negotiations in the direction of reaching an agreement.

　　During the seventh round of negotiations, there was not only a tense working meal, but also a well-prepared welcome dinner.

　　After the talks, the White House released five photos about Sino-US economic and trade consultations, three of which were about the welcome banquet.

　　This time, I also found some photos of the White House welcome banquet.

　　For a simple analogy, this is roughly equivalent to hosting a banquet in Zhongnanhai.

　　Americans adopt a rare high specification.

　　Before the official welcome dinner, Wright Heze and Navarro also accompanied Vice Premier Liu He to visit the Blair State Guesthouse, which is rare. ↓

　　More than 10 days have passed since the seventh round of negotiations.

　　Judging from the information and details released by both sides, China and the United States are getting closer and closer to reaching an agreement.

　　As the news said, "the whole weekend has been in consultation, including now the economic and trade teams of both sides are communicating around the clock and negotiating the text."

　　Williams, deputy director of the White House National Economic Council, also missed a message on the 8 th:

　　"The two sides are talking every day and the negotiations are making progress, but there is still a lot of work to be done."

　　Of course, there have been some different voices coming from the United States recently.

　　They are old rivals, and they are familiar with each other’s routines.

　　People talk nonsense, let’s listen to it.

　　Wait a little longer, it is estimated that the result will come soon.

　　Cctv newsIn 1999, Zhou and Zheng, who lived in zhouning county, Ningde City, Fujian Province, had an injury dispute. Zhouning county People’s Court ruled that Zheng’s behavior was excessive defense. In 2000, he was sent back for retrial by Ningde Intermediate People’s Court. Subsequently, due to doubts about the injury identification, several levels of people’s procuratorial organs maintained their decision not to prosecute.

　　After 20 years of complaint, Zhou finally ushered in a turning point on October 31st this year, and a special public hearing was held in the Supreme People’s Procuratorate. How did the 20-year case happen? What is the crux of the case? What problems can the hearing solve?

　　This is the hearing scene of a criminal appeal case in Fujian Province on October 31, 2019. Zhou and Zheng are the focus of this hearing. Two people of the same age were completely changed in their lives because of a case that happened nearly 20 years ago. After many years, for the first time, they sat down and solved the problem face to face in this way. What kind of dispute happened in that year? Why did the Supreme People’s Procuratorate hold a hearing of such a scale and handle Zhou’s complaint by public examination? It starts with a dispute that happened in 1999.

　　Zhou helped a friend to discuss that he was hit by Zheng throwing stones.

　　At that time, Zhou and Zheng were both 25 years old, living in zhouning county, Ningde City, Fujian Province, and didn’t know each other. On the evening of December 4, 1999, because of the emotional breakdown with his girlfriend, Zheng went to his girlfriend’s house with his family to deal with the dispute, and had an argument with the social youth Ruan and others present, and then there was a physical conflict.

　　On the other hand, Zou was angry, but at about 9 o’clock that night, he called Zhou and several other friends, a total of more than 10 people, and planned to go to Zheng to discuss it.

　　The photos of the scene in that year showed that there were three floors in Zheng’s building, and scattered bricks could be seen on the ground of the second floor corridor. According to the police’s on-site investigation record, the wall of Zheng’s outer courtyard is 2.6 meters high, and there are traces of climbing and stepping at a distance of 2 meters from the ground. Zheng’s mother recalled that there was more than one person who climbed the wall and tried to break into her house.

　　Zhou said that he did not participate in climbing the wall at that time, but stood outside the door all the time. Seeing bricks falling, he hid in an alley.

　　That night, Zhou was treated in the county hospital and was later identified as seriously injured by the forensic doctor of the county public security bureau. In September 2000, the People’s Procuratorate of zhouning county initiated a public prosecution, accusing the defendant Zheng of intentionally injuring others’ bodies and causing serious injuries, and should be investigated for criminal responsibility for intentional injury.

　　The first instance ruled that Zheng had defended himself when the two appealed.

　　In 2000, the People’s Court of zhouning county made a judgment that Zheng’s behavior was excessive defense and he should compensate Zhou for a loss of more than 15,000 yuan. However, both of them refused to accept the verdict and continued to appeal to the court.

　　The judgment of the first instance of the case shows that more than 10 people, including Zou, gathered Zhou and so on, went to the defendant Zheng’s house at 9: 00 pm, threw bricks and stones into the corridor on the second floor, and climbed the wall to enter, thus committing illegal infringement. Defendant Zheng used bricks to stop and bruise Zhou’s head, which constituted serious injury. His defensive behavior obviously exceeded the necessary limit, which was excessive defense and his behavior constituted intentional injury. However, Zhou thought that he was seriously injured, and the court sentenced the defendant Zheng too low. Zheng insisted that he was a legitimate defense and should not bear criminal responsibility.

　　The case of doubtful evidence appraisal was sent back for retrial.

　　In 2000, the case came to the Intermediate People’s Court of Ningde City. After trial, the court made a decision to "revoke the original judgment and send it back for retrial". There are three reasons: first, some witnesses’ testimonies, on-site investigation photos and other evidence have not been cross-examined in court; Second, the testimony of Xiao, the main witness, was illegal, and the witness did not appear in court. The third reason why the case was sent back for retrial is that Ningde Intermediate People’s Court, after conducting a documentary review of Zhou’s injury appraisal report, considered that the medical evidence that his injury constituted a serious injury was insufficient.

　　At that time, no one thought that these two thin pages of injury identification would affect the direction of the whole case in the future, and even lead to the inability to continue the judicial process. In December 2000, the case was sent back for retrial, and the zhouning county People’s Procuratorate re-collected evidence to supplement it.

　　It is difficult to re-identify the injury with doubtful medical records.　

　　Because the original appraisal conclusion could not be adopted, in September 2001, the People’s Procuratorate of zhouning county entrusted the First Hospital of Ningde City to re-appraise Zhou. However, after reviewing the materials, the hospital believes that "the medical record has legal effect and cannot be supplemented or changed at will afterwards" and "it is difficult to re-identify the injury in view of the doubts in the hospitalized case of the injured person".

　　After receiving the decision of non-prosecution from the county procuratorate, Zhou submitted a complaint to the county procuratorate, the municipal procuratorate and the provincial procuratorate in turn. The results of the review by several procuratorial organs were to maintain the original decision of non-prosecution.

　　The prosecutor in charge believes that Zhou’s criminal complaint case has certain complexity and particularity, and it is necessary to hold a hearing because of the strong professionalism of forensic injury identification.

　　Invite experts and lawyers to publicly hear the case.

　　On October 31, 2019, a public hearing was held in the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, and forensic doctors, lawyers, legal experts and several NPC deputies were invited to attend. Conduct a public hearing on the crux of the case, Zhou’s injury identification.

　　At the hearing, the prosecutor combed the evidence materials with detailed pictures and texts. According to the inspection certificate made by zhouning county Public Security Bureau on December 30, 1999, "Zhou’s head was injured by blunt instrument, and there was a skull base fracture, accompanied by facial and auditory nerve injury and cerebrospinal fluid leakage, as well as epidural hematoma, subdural effusion and parietal bone fracture caused by blunt instrument injury, which constituted serious injuries." It is based on Articles 41 and 44 of the 1990 edition of the Appraisal Standard for Serious Human Injury.

　　Forensic experts believe that in all the medical records of Zhou, there is only a literal diagnosis conclusion of "skull base fracture", and there is no objective medical examination support, so the injury cannot be identified accordingly.

　　What are the flaws in medical record identification and why are the authenticity in doubt?

　　The prosecutor in charge of the case noticed that even the written diagnosis conclusions in the original materials were inconsistent in many places, and it was suspected that there were supplementary changes.

　　In addition to the suspected modification of the medical records, the more critical time of Zhou’s admission and discharge is also inconsistent in many places, and even conflicts with the time of the incident.

　　The transcripts of all the parties and the results of police investigations show that the time of the incident was on the evening of December 4. Why was Zhou’s admission time registered as 11 am on the 4 th in some materials?

　　The undertaker of the original case and the undertaker of the original review case show the evidence, and after the forensic experts express their professional opinions, the hearing officers express their opinions on the facts and evidence of the case.

　　Subsequently, the host announced the adjournment and the hearing officer reviewed the case. Form a hearing comment.