Some time ago, "Wenhui Scholar" published a short article entitled "A photo that has been repeatedly mistaken for Qian Daosun" (April 12, 2019), aiming at clarifying that the photo of Qian Dao’s granddaughter Liu Jie is generally regarded as Qian Daosun’s mistake in the internet and newspapers. At the end of the article, the author said: "There are not many photos of Qian Daosun preserved by the descendants of the Qian family, and even the photos of his youth can’t be found. Let’s add a photo of his later years to the layout. (The photo is kept by Qian Jia). " After reading it at that time, my intuition was that Qian Daosun (1887-1966) was very famous in the Republic of China, and he was as famous as Zhou Zuoren as a translator of Japanese literature. According to the truth, there must be many images about Qian Daosun in the old magazines of the Republic of China. Because Qian Daosun not only worked as a "civil servant" in the Ministry of Education of the Republic of China, but also served as a lecturer in the Japanese Department of Peking University very early, teaching Japanese and Japanese history, and later served as the curator of the National Peking Library, and then was hired as a professor of Tsinghua University to teach oriental history, and later took over as the curator of the Tsinghua University Library from Zhu Ziqing. Therefore, it is impossible to leave a video record of the complicated experience of being an official and studying. The carriers of these images are undoubtedly all kinds of old newspapers and related peripheral documents. So the author is very curious, so I found some images of Qian Daosun in my spare time, which are not found in today’s online media and newspapers. I thought it was very interesting at that time, so I sent some photos in my circle of friends.

Soon, WeChat official account, the "Scholar of Wenhui", published Wu Zhen’s Qian Daosun, which ran into Zhou Zuoren’s face (published on April 19th, hereinafter referred to as "Alumni Record"), which was a supplement and revision to the previous article. The author mainly "searched for information from two little-used ways". One is the graduation alumni record of national universities during the Republic of China, a list of universities, etc.-this is the basic material source that can be thought of, because Qian Daosun is a "university middleman" after all, and he is also a co-employed professor from "Green Pepper" to the Foreign Languages Department and History Department of Tsinghua. Second, Japanese and puppet photographic publications and archives at that time, such as "North Branch" and the image archives of North China Communications Co., Ltd., which were made public in recent years. Therefore, the author found six photos of Qian Daosun, some of which coincide with what the author found.

In fact, this phenomenon shows that Qian Daosun has been "missing" for a long time in the field of literature and history research. At present, I have only seen Zou Shuangshuang’s Japanese monograph "The Traitor" Huばれた Male-Wan Ye Ji をせした㇗ぞのぞぞの "(April 2014) It can be said that this modern scholar, who had a close acquaintance with Lu Xun in his early years, was proficient in Japanese, Italian and other languages, medicine, art and drama, and played an important role in Sino-Japanese cultural exchanges, has long been forgotten. The reason is of course his "falling into the water" experience after the outbreak of the Anti-Japanese War, such as serving as the president of the pseudo-Peking University, maintaining the affairs of Peking University together with Zhou Zuoren in the occupied area of Peiping, and attending two "Great East Asian Writers’ Conferences".

As Wu Zhen’s article "Classmates Record" said, "It is really difficult to find photos of people in the Republic of China", "But if we can find the right path", "more and more photos of Qian Daosun will be rummaged out from the corner of history". This paper "rummages" some rare photos of Qian Daosun (1925-1963), providing some basic materials and historical sense for the study of image, Qian Daosun and literature and history in the occupied areas, and briefly introducing the image background. In order to avoid repetition, the photos published in the previous article are not repeated. It should be noted that at the completion of this article, I read the Old Shadow of Quan Shou Shu before Collection published by Wenhui Scholar (May 17th), and provided several photos of Qian Daosun in Arts and Arts Magazine, National Magazine and Magazine, which had the same influence source as this article, but because the author relied on the low-pixel photocopied version of the journal database of the Republic of China of the National Library, the clarity of the photos taken by the original magazine was different.

1. Farewell party of Chinese Studies Department of Chen Wanli, Qian Daosun and Peking University Institute.

This photo was collected by Chen Wanli, a famous ceramic research expert and an early photographer in China, and was taken in the "First Special Session of Photography and Film Art" by Xiling Press in the spring of 2017. Official website of Xiling Press introduced the photo as follows:

Chen Wanli (1892 ~ 1969) took photos and inscribed the precious photos of Peking University’s farewell to the northwest scientific investigation group.

Catalog number: 2871

Appraisal RMB: 40,000－60,000.

Transaction price: RMB: 63,250 (including commission)

There are two basic historical errors here. First of all, this photo was not taken by Chen Wanli. Secondly, this is not "Peking University’s farewell to the northwest scientific investigation group".

Chen Wanli, whose real name is Peng, whose name is Wan Li, graduated from Beijing National Medical College in 1917. In 1925, Chen Wanli was a school doctor in Peking University and worked in the Institute of History and Language. At that time, Professor Langdon Warner, an archaeological team of Harvard University in the United States, and others were going to lead a team to Dunhuang for a one-year inspection, and they needed a Chinese guide. Therefore, John C.Ferguson, the then Beiyang government, introduced them and invited people from the Sinology School of Peking University Research Institute to participate, so Chen Wanli was chosen to accompany the archaeological team of Warner. It started from Beijing on February 16th, 1925 and returned on July 31st, lasting five and a half months. On the day before departure, the National Studies Department of Peking University Research Institute held a farewell party for Chen Wanli.

Historically, the "Northwest Scientific Investigation Team" was formally established in April 1927, and it has the significance of declaring the autonomy and ownership of China’s cultural relics archaeology, mainly aiming at the behavior that Sven Hedin and others of the Swedish expedition will go to the northwest provinces of China to inspect geology, meteorology and collect cultural relics. For example, the academic circles in Beijing initiated the establishment of "China Association of Academic Organizations" and published "Declaration against Outsiders Taking China Antiquities at Will", and so on. In 1925, Chen Wanli was only the accompanying guide of the American archaeological team, while in 1927, there were 15 members from China and 23 members from foreign countries in the northwest scientific expedition, so this expedition was also called "fighting for academic sovereignty". (For details, please refer to Guo Jianrong’s "Northwest Scientific Research Departs from Peking University" and "Peking University School Newspaper" on May 15, 2007).

On May 9, 1927, the Chinese members of the Northwest Scientific Investigation Team took a group photo with the farewell party when they set out from the National Studies Department of Peking University Research Institute.

This photo collected by Chen Wanli was taken on February 15th, 1925. The characters in the photo are either "big coffee" or on the way to becoming "big coffee". The most familiar ones are naturally Hu Shi and Lin Yutang. Several inscriptions on the photo were written by Chen Wanli in different periods. The middle ones are "Hu Shizhi, Zhang Fengju, Shen Jianshi, Chang Hui, Zhu Yixian, Yuan Xiyuan, Li Xuanbo, Rong Geng, Qian Daosun, Chen Yuanan, Xu Xusheng, Lin Yutang, Ma Shuping, Shen Yinmo and Ye Haowu" from right to left, with 15 people in mind. The inscription on the right side of the photo was written in January 1947: "Before going to Dunhuang in the 14th spring of the People’s Republic of China, I took a photo when Peking University was friendly and farewell."

However, a closer look at the photos shows that there are 17 people standing, except Chen Wanli himself (standing in the middle), and the name of one person is not recorded in the inscription. After returning to Beijing from Dunhuang, Chen Wanli wrote "Journey to the West Diary", in which it was mentioned that on Sunday, February 15th, "I got up early and went to the Third Hospital (according to Peking University). Mr. Xiyuan, Mr. Kaneshi and Mr. Shu Pingsan had been here first and had a long talk. At ten o’clock, the farewell party of the Institute of Chinese Studies was held. The attendees included Shen Jianshi, Ma Shuping, Yuan Xiyuan, Hu Shizhi, Ye Haowu, Lin Yutang, Chen Yuanan, Zhang Fengju, Shen Yinmo, Huang Zhongliang, Li Xuanbo, Xu Xusheng, Chang Weijun, Rong Xibai, Zhu Yixian and Qian Daosun. Mr. Shu Ping gave a farewell speech first, followed by Yu Zhi’s reply. Mr. Jian Shi, Shi Zhi, Xi Yuan, Yu Tang and Hao Wu all have messages. After the meeting, please take a photo with Mr Wu Yuzhou. After returning to the Chinese studies door, I discussed with Yu Zhou, Yu Qing, Mei Zhuang and Wen Yu about some of the affairs of the Qing Dynasty Aftercare Committee photography. Therefore, the photographer of this photo is Wu Yuzhou. The person whose name is not recorded in the photo caption is Zheng Tianting (the first from the right in the last row, standing behind Zhang Fengju). Since 1924, Zheng Tianting has been a lecturer in Peking University Preparatory School. In addition, it was Huang Zhongliang (Huang Wenbi, the word Zhongliang) who attended the farewell party but did not appear in the photo. Huang Wenbi is a famous archaeologist in China. He graduated from the Philosophy Department of Peking University in 1918. In 1924, he worked in the antique showroom in Shen Jianshi to arrange cultural relics. In the same year, the Archaeological Research Office of the National Studies Department of Peking University established the Archaeological Society, and Huang Wenbi became one of the earliest members.The specific reason why Huang Wenbi didn’t attend the photo shoot is unknown.

So, why did Chen Wanli ask Wu Yuzhou to help him take photos? The reason is very simple, because Wu Yuzhou is a photography artist himself, and he is a key member of a community organization with Chen Wanli. In 1923, Chen Wanli, Wu Yuzhou, Huang Zhenhua, Liu Bannong and others initiated the establishment of the first photographic art group "Art Photo Research Association" in China (later renamed "Light Society"). In 1924, Chen Wanli took up the photography task of the Clean Room Aftercare Committee, so there will be a record in the diary of "discussing with Yu Zhou, Yu Qing, Mei Zhuang and Wen Yu about some affairs of the Clean Room Aftercare Committee photography". In addition, in 1924, Wu Yuzhou was also the tutor of photography department of Peking University Plastic Arts Research Association. In the early 1920s, the Plastic Arts Research Association of Peking University was chaired by Qian Daosun, who served as the vice president and its president was Cai Yuanpei. This is naturally the institutionalized design of "aesthetic education replacing religion".

In his early years, Qian Daosun loved and studied fine arts and medicine, not the translation and introduction of Japanese literature. Therefore, he has written and translated many articles related to art and medicine. In 1924, he also translated Volby’s Plastic Art in Germany (published by the Commercial Press). In 1925, Qian Daosun in the photo was 36 years old, with a flat head, round wide-brimmed glasses and a moustache, and looked older. In 1924, Chen Wanli published Gale Collection-One of Chen Wanli’s Photographic Works. Qian Daosun not only prefaced it, but also wrote a letter to Sun Fuyuan of Morning Post to introduce Gale Collection at the End of Chen Wanli: "I have known an artist for more than ten years. But he doesn’t take art as his profession, nor does he hear people calling him an artist; However, it is his whole life to be truly grateful for the natural beauty and not be able to create artistic beauty that expresses individuality in various ways. Many people know that he is a physician, and many people know that he is a man who can do things; Although he sometimes makes mountain ink paintings and sometimes sees himself on the stage, few people know that he is an artistic genius and has a very rich artistic life. "

Although the photographer of the auction is not Chen Wanli, this photo is really precious. However, I don’t know how the photographer feels. Fortunately, it is not a fake, and it is not bad for money or points. The lesson that onlookers can learn is that a photo auctioned for more than 60 thousand RMB shows that there are still ways to learn literature, history and philosophy well-at least it can save money.

Second, Ono Nobutaro’s Essay Beijing and Qian Daosun.

In 1940, Nobutaro Ono published "Essays on Beijing" in Tokyo’s No.1 study room, including an essay "Zhou Zuoren and Qian Daosun" with two photos, namely Zhou Zuoren and Qian Daosun. Among them, Qian Daosun’s photo has a self-signed signature, which must be presented to Ono Nobutaro. Zhou Zuoren’s photo was taken in Badaowan at a glance. Because at first glance, it looks very similar to the famous "selfie" photo after assassination in 1939.

In 1939, it was taken after Zhou Zuoren was assassinated.

Zhou Zuoren and Qian Daosun describes the author’s feelings of visiting Zhou Zuoren and Qian Daosun and expresses his admiration. In the expression of the "Japanese school" in the Republic of China, it is a common practice to mention "weekly money" together. As early as 1935, Cosmic Wind magazine published "Zhou Zuoren and Qian Daosun-two people I know who know Japan" signed by Gu Liang, which was already called this.

Nobutaro Ono went to Peiping in 1936 as a special researcher of Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs in China. During his stay in China, he had many contacts with famous scholars in Peiping. In fact, it is difficult to study the history of Sino-Japanese cultural exchange or "students studying in Japan" and "Japanese coming to China" without going around Zhou Zuoren and Qian Daosun. Qian Daosun lived in Shoubi Hutong at that time, and Japanese students and scholars in China often visited him at home, and even lodged with him. For related descriptions, please refer to Professor C by Yoshikawa, Memories of Mr. Qian Daosun by Ishida Kansuke, and Mr. Qian Daosun by Munaga Tiancheng, including the essays by Nobutaro Ono, and so on. Qian Daosun also founded the Quanshoudong Document Collection, which specializes in Japanese books and periodicals, for people to read. In addition, it is worth mentioning that Nobutaro Ono is also a member of the "Preparatory Committee" established by the National Assembly of the Japanese Literature Newspaper "People who are proficient in things around the co-prosperity circle". The so-called "Great East Asian Writers’ Conference" was planned by the Japanese Literature Newspaper Congress.

Third, Qian Daosun and Quan Shoudong’s Document Collection

These three photos are from No.1, Volume 2, 1944, of which the rare photo was taken by Qian Daosun in Quanshoudong Document Collection in 1934. Yang Liansheng used to be a student of Qian Daosun who taught Japanese in Tsinghua. He recorded in the article "Yi En Shi": "From about 1921, I set up a collection of Japanese books at home (East Wing) to collect Japanese books for people to read. It is mainly about literature and history, and its content is rich. In terms of personal book collection, it may be the largest in China at that time. " However, according to Japanese scholar Masako Inamori’s research in "Izumi Satoshi’s Private Japanese Language Library" (see also Su Zhenshu’s "A Letter about the Izumi Satoshi Satoshi Tojo Library"), Qian Daosun should have founded the "Izumi Tojo Document Collection" around 1930, and the Japanese Matsumura Taro. After the "September 18th Incident" in 1931, the "Book Collection" was temporarily closed and reopened the following year, which lasted until about 1935.

The captions of the other two photos are: "Qian Daosun and his wife were photographed at their residence in Chihiromachi, Japan in the 24th year of the Republic of China", and "Mr. Qian Daosun is in Japanese works". During Tsinghua’s time, Qian Daosun visited Japan many times or bought books. From 1934 to 1935, Qian Daosun, as a guide, led the "Tsinghua University Tour Group to Japan" to inspect Japan. According to Tsinghua Weekly (Volume 41, No.10, 1934), Gu Xianliang’s "The Bottom Trip of Our School’s Tour Group to Japan" records that on April 4, 1934, Qian Daosun and others set off from Tsinghua, arrived in Kobe on April 8, and arrived in Tokyo the next day. Qiao Guanhua and other students from Tsinghua who stayed in Tokyo welcomed them at the station and stayed at the Japanese Society. During their stay in Japan, Qian Daosun and others took part in various activities, followed by visits to Yokohama and Kyoto, and returned to Peiping on April 24th.

In addition, according to "Dining Notes of the Historical Society" (Tsinghua Weekly, Volume 43, No.4, 1935), one of the original intentions of this dinner was to set up a holiday for Qian Daosun to study in Japan in the second half of the year, and hoped that Qian Daosun would complete the purpose of going to Japan-to learn from Japanese scholars’ research on the history of China and investigate the unique and important information on China’s history, so as to purchase it. The photos published in Art and Literature Magazine in 1944 should have been taken during Qian Daosun’s vacation trip to Japan in 1935. The magazine was founded in July, 1943 and finally published in May, 1945. It is a part of the "Great East Asian Subculture Construction Movement" and aims to establish "Great East Asian Literature". Zhou Zuoren is an "important author" of this magazine, and many essays are published in this magazine. As for why Art Magazine published photos of Qian Daosun ten years ago, in a sense, the leader wanted to put the "daily" academic and cultural exchanges in 1935 in the "exceptional state" in 1944, so as to give it a specific meaning.

Fourth, Qian Daosun’s trip to Suzhou, a rare photo with Shu Yuan.

From left: Shu Yuan, Qian Daosun, and Japanese war literature writer Huoye Weiping, November 1944.

The photo was published in No.3, Volume 14, Magazine in 1944. This issue is a "Special Impressions of Writers", which is actually a special collection of writers about the third "Great East Asian Writers’ Conference". In November 1944, Japan’s war of aggression against China was a spent force, so the third "Great East Asian Writers’ Conference" was not held in Tokyo, Japan, like the previous two, but was held in Nanjing under the Wang puppet government. On the previous day, it was "the first session of China Literature Annual Meeting". After the meeting, about two-thirds of the participating writers went to Suzhou for a one-day trip, and for this reason, the magazine invited "our colleagues in Suzhou to invite Suzhou writers to write together and write’ Writers in Suzhou’ to impress each other".

At breakfast on the morning of November 11th, 1944, there was a table in Shanghai (including writers such as Louis, Bao Tianxiao and Tao Jingsun) and a table in North China. "The two sides are unfamiliar, so it’s too early to talk". After breakfast, three or four people, such as Zhou Yueran and Qian Daosun, took the car, and the rest took the bus. After getting off the bus, I learned, "I received a telegram last night, and Chairman Wang has died, so I am very sorry to stop the banquet these days." Wang Jingwei died in Nagoya, Japan at 10: 30am on November 10th, 1944. The China Literature Annual Meeting was held in Nanjing the next day, and the third Great East Asian Writers Conference was also held in Nanjing on November 12th. This is a symbol of history.

At the "China Literature Annual Meeting" held on November 11th, Qian Daosun was elected as the speaker and Tao Jingsun as the deputy speaker. Qian Daosun delivered a speech at the meeting, "First describe the significance of the meeting, and hope that everyone will unite and work hard for China’s cultural construction. The words are extremely brief". He is "nearly 60 years old, his hair is bald, his back is bent, and there are three deep wrinkles between his eyebrows. He has a small gray beard under his nose, and his face is ruddy. He is short and short, wearing a blue and black jacket, and his voice is low and weak. (See Yang Guangzheng’s China Literature Annual Meeting)

At this time, Qian Daosun served as the dean of the pseudo-Peking University College of Literature, and was the "chief representative" of China in the conference. Shu Yuan is the pseudo director of Jiangsu Education Department, so Qian Daosun will have a photo with him. That night was a reception dinner hosted by the pseudo-Jiangsu provincial government. Yuan Shu gave a welcome speech. Qian Daosun said that he had been to Suzhou more than forty years ago, "but he didn’t say much except a very short thank you speech". Qian Daosun also gave a lecture at the Pseudo-Jiangsu Institute of Education, where Lu Wanyi was the director of liberal arts at that time.

Five, "Zhou Qian" and "Rehabilitation of China Culture Symposium"

This photo can be found in the so-called "Symposium on Rebuilding China’s Culture", published in the 19th issue of the Digest edited and published by the Digest Society of Fudan University in 1938. This article is translated from the Japanese Osaka Daily News’s Symposium on Rebuilding China Culture, with the translator’s signature Yu Shihua. The introduction before the article thinks that "although the convening of this symposium was nominally initiated by Osaka Daily News Agency, I don’t think anyone can assert that it was not inspired by Japanese fascist warlords". On February 9, 1938, the symposium on "Rebuilding China’s Culture" was held in Peiping. The names of Zhou Zuoren, Qian Daosun and other well-known cultural figures were seen in the newspapers, and there were photos, which quickly caused great surprise and indignation among intellectuals in China’s rear during the war. Mao Dun, Hu Feng and Hu Qiuyuan jointly signed an Open Letter to Zhou Zuoren in Anti-enemy Literature and Art, urging them to leave Peiping quickly. "Otherwise, there is only agreement." After the forum, Zhou Zuoren and Qian Daosun successively assumed pseudo-posts, such as the director of the pseudo-Peking University Library, the dean of the College of Arts, the secretary-general of the pseudo-Peking University, and the supervision of the General Administration of Education of Japan and Japan.

There is only one side photo of Qian Daosun in the group photo, which is opposite to Zhou Zuoren’s position. It can be described as "Zhou Qian". However, Osaka Daily News mistook Qian Daosun’s name and wrote it as "Qiandao Village". It is reported that Qian Daosun made a brief speech at the forum: "My opinion coincides with that of Mr. Zhou. Even if Gai studied in "Beijing" for three or four years and didn’t go to Japan, it would be useless. In’ Beijing’, there are only middle schools that teach Japanese. I think it is really necessary to teach Japanese in middle school. "

6. In 1940, Qian Daosun attended and finished classes in the pseudo-Peking University.

This photo is taken from Qiu Wei’s book "Xing Wu Qianjia: The Fracture and Inheritance of Modern Academic and Cultural Families" (Zhejiang University Press, 2009), in which it is stated that the photo was provided by Mr. Yang Shaojing. There is also a Chinese inscription on the photo. Judging from the tone, the writer and photographer are Japanese: "So far, I have lived a school life every day, and educating those promising young people can really be called a great or happy person! In June, 1940, it was taken at the end of class in Beijing, China University.

Judging from the shooting time, this photo happens to be from the same period as the two photos of Qian Daosun in the "North China Traffic Photo Archives", and the photographer should be the same person. The photos numbered 35072 and 35070 in the "North China Traffic Photo Archives" were shown in December of the 15th year of Showa (1940), and the photographers were all Qiaozhao.

North China traffic photo file, Qian Daosun at this time as a pseudo-Peking University Secretary-General.

Eight, 1942, Qian Daosun.

These two books are from the ninth issue of Volume 3 of National Magazine in 1943. One of them introduces Qian Daosun’s life experience, and also says that "Mr. Wang attended the first Great East Asian Writers’ Conference last autumn on behalf of the literary circles in North China, and made great contributions to the exchange of Chinese and Japanese literature". From this, we can also get a general idea of the propaganda caliber of National Magazine.

Nine, Qian Daosun and the "Great East Asian Writers Conference"

Quoted from Wang Xiangyuan’s "Pen Army and the War of Aggression against China —— Research and Criticism on Japanese Literature of Aggression against China", Kunlun Press, 2015.

Wu Zhen’s "Classmate Record" said that Qian Daosun "presided over the Great East Asian Writers’ Conference for three consecutive years", which is not accurate. Qian Daosun has participated in two Great East Asian Writers’ Conferences, the first in Tokyo in 1942 and the third in Nanjing in 1944. Interestingly, on November 10, 1942, on the closing day of the first Great East Asian Writers’ Conference, NHK (News Image No.127, 1 minute and 40 seconds in total) in Japan once reported the conference, among which there were more than ten seconds’ video materials of rich rice sun, Shen Qiwu and others, which were very rare.

Qian Daosun, Speaker of the Third Great East Asian Writers’ Congress

The above-mentioned images of the Third Great East Asian Writers’ Congress are from the 17th issue of Volume 6 of Continental Pictorial in 1945. Qian Daosun is speaking as the speaker of the Third Great East Asian Writers’ Congress. Wu Zhen quoted the Special Edition of the Third Great East Asian Writers’ Conference, but the book was not accompanied by drawings. Among them, the special edition of the conference introduced Qian Daosun’s "unsmiling, Old Master Q style of Chinese studies".

Interestingly, when I looked up the archives of the National History Museum in Taiwan Province, I found that the museum collected photos of the third Great East Asian Writers’ Conference, one of which was a live photo of Qian Daosun’s speech at the conference, while the other picture was marked as "Qian Daosun is presenting awards to winners" and it was "Zhang Guan Li Dai" again.

Qian Daosun spoke on the stage at the Third Great East Asian Writers’ Conference. Quoted from Taiwan Province National History Museum, Wang Zhaoming Historical Materials, Wang Government Meetings and Awards Photos, collection number: 118-030200-0005-025.

The above picture just contrasts with the picture of "the meeting place of writers" in Continental Pictorial, and we can get a sense of wholeness. The flag of "Puppet Manchukuo", party flag of Kuomintang (Wang Puppet Regime) and Japanese flag are hung behind the rostrum of the conference.

Quoted from Taiwan Province National History Museum, Wang Zhaoming Historical Materials, Wang Government Meetings and Awards Photos, collection number: 118-030200-0005-052.

The above two pictures are from Taiwan Province National History Museum and Continental Pictorial respectively. The first picture is marked as "Award presented by the Speaker (Qian Daosun) of the Third Conference of Writers of Wang Government". In fact, if we look closely at the original picture, we can see that Qian Daosun is the one with a slight silhouette on the left side of the winner, and from the second picture, we can see that there is a sign on the podium that says "Speaker", so it is not Qian Daosun who awards the prize to the winner, but another person.

X. When Zhou Zuoren visited Japan in 1941, "Zhou Qian" shared a seat.

Zhou Zuoren and Qian Daosun visited Japan. Quoted from Wang Xirong’s "A Group of Photos about Zhou Zuoren", Shanghai Luxun Studies, No.2, 2005.

On April 6, 1941, as the newly appointed supervisor of the General Education Department of the North China Government Affairs Committee, Zhou Zuoren led a delegation of judges from the East Asian Cultural Agreement Association to visit Japan to attend the special ministerial meeting of the East Asian Cultural Association held in Kyoto. Zhou Zuoren, Qian Daosun and others belonged to the Ministry of Literature. At noon on April 17th, in Tokyo’s Xinggang Chaliao, many celebrities in Japanese literary circles held a luncheon to welcome Zhou Zuoren, and Qian Daosun also attended. Topics include "the review of Chinese and Japanese literary circles, and the anecdotes of the two countries".

Xi. Qian Daosun and the East Asian Cultural Agreement

Group photo of the second Council of East Asian Cultural Agreement, held at Imperial University Hall, Tokyo on December 2, 1938. Qian Daosun sits in the first row, 16th from the right.

The East Asian Cultural Agreement Society is an important organization of the Japanese Puppet in North China. It was established on August 30, 1938, and belongs to the Puppet Ministry of Education and the Xinmin Society. Zhou Zuoren was the second president, in which Qian Daosun served as a pseudo-post. Qian Daosun was a permanent member, a lecturer at Xinmin College, a reviewer in the Literature Department, and presided over the reviewer meeting as the chairman.

There must be some images about Qian Daosun, which will be excavated later. As for Qian Daosun’s "face value" in the image, we can quote an article that has never been noticed, entitled "Impression of Qian Daosun", published in the third issue of Gale in 1941, and the author signed You Wu. Gale was a Jinan publication under Wang’s puppet regime, so Wang Jingwei, Chen Gongbo and others all published articles in it. The reason why the above article has not been quoted by scholars is probably because the tout or the hand people wrote Qian Daosun’s name wrong. The article said, "Mr. Qian is already a famous old professor in China. He is not very tall, his body is quite burly, his face is oblong, and he has a pair of extremely deep myopia glasses on his nose. Under his nose, he has a moustache and his hair is half white. No matter in winter or summer, I always wear domestic cloth with a pair of Melaleuca dress tweed shoes under my feet. It looks like a scholar. That face, manner and even costume are similar to the old man in Zhitang in Kuyu Zhai. If they sit together, then someone will mistake them for Kunzhong because they are too similar. " The juxtaposition of Zhou Zuoren and Qian Daosun may also be a kind of political rhetoric.

At present, among all the models equipped with Huawei Gankun Zhijia, Deep Blue L07 is the most cost-effective.

Then, with the dark blue L07 blessed by Huawei technology in intelligent driving, what about the experience of the smart cockpit?

In this issue of "Machine Lab", let’s have an in-depth experience.

Cockpit hardware

Although the design of Deep Blue L07 is almost the same as that of sister model Deep Blue SL03, the configuration of intelligent cockpit has been upgraded to some extent.

For example, the "Sunflower Central Control Screen" with deep blue features is not only standard in the whole system, but also the screen size has increased from 14.6 inches to 15.6 inches. The resolution of 2.5K is also the first echelon in the same price model.

In terms of performance, Deep Blue L07 uses Qualcomm 8155 chip and improves the running memory of the lathe from 12G to 16G.

In addition, compared with the cockpit of the dark blue SL03, the dark blue L07 has a very obvious change, that is, the whole system uses AR-HUD instead of LCD instruments.

Judging from the actual display effect, even in the strong light environment, the AR-HUD of deep blue L07 still has good clarity and rich displayable contents.

As for audio, Deep Blue L07 also provides an optional package with 22 speakers, which supports 7.1.4 channels. For this price model, it is very rare.

Below the central control screen is the area where the mobile phone is wirelessly charged. The measured maximum charging power is 50w, which can be compatible with wireless fast charging of Huawei, Xiaomi and other mobile phones.

If there is any regret about the cockpit hardware of Deep Blue L07, it is definitely one that the whole system only supports 4G networks.

I hope that Deep Blue L07 can add the 5G network to the upgrade list in the later changes.

Interactive experience

In terms of interactive experience, Deepal OS equipped with Deep Blue L07 underwent an OTA upgrade in mid-November, and the latest version is 2.3.0.

From the layout of the homepage, the DOCK bar of Deep Blue L07 is located at the bottom of the screen. Except for the three system buttons on the far left and the air conditioning settings in the middle, most of the other icons can be adjusted after long press.

Above the DOCK bar, Deep Blue L07 provides various types of small card components, which can quickly check various information of vehicles. Of course, these small cards also support customization.

In the design of desktop background, Deep Blue L07 provides two options, namely wallpaper desktop and 3D car control desktop.

Compared with most models of the same price, this 3D model of Deep Blue L07 not only has higher fluency, but also has excellent rendering accuracy.

Next, I have to mention the most "ingenious" interactive experience of Deep Blue L07.

Generally speaking, sliding down from the top of the screen, whether Apple or Android, even Nokia, will enter the notification center or control center.

But on the deep blue L07, sliding down from the top of the screen, the first thing that appears in front of you is the local application.

As for the control center, it is placed between the three-party application and the handcart interconnection, which is really confusing.

After spending a day with Deep Blue L07, I personally still don’t adapt to this interactive logic. I wonder how you feel in front of the screen?

Software ecology

Although the interactive logic of Deep Blue L07 is rather strange, its performance in software ecology is excellent.

First of all, let’s take a look at the experience of navigation function, which is also one of the most frequently used functions in the intelligent cockpit.

Because Deep Blue L07 adopts "Huawei’s Gankun Intelligent Driving", it uses Petal Maps from Huawei in navigation.

Judging from the number of functions and actual experience, the performance of Petal Maps is now no less than that of old navigation software such as Gaode and Baidu.

At the same time, the design of navigation and intelligent driving functions in one has become the unique advantage of Petal Maps.

As for the audio-visual experience, common car entertainment software such as QQ music, Iqiyi, and Bi Li can be found on Deep Blue L07.

Among them, QQ music, as the main audio source of Deep Blue L07, is deeply customized for Deepal OS.

Not only the UI design is highly unified with the system style, but also the functions such as sound effect setting and light show of vehicles can be directly linked.

In addition, the app store of Deep Blue L07 also provides a wealth of third-party applications and games for download.

What’s more interesting is that in the classification of practical tools, I found that Deep Blue L07 also provides two softwares that are not very practical but can provide emotional value.

In addition to the rich software ecology, Deep Blue L07 is well prepared for the interconnection of mobile phones and cars.

Not only can Huawei, Xiaomi and other domestic mobile phones be supported for handcart interconnection, but the appearance of Apple CarPlay also makes Deep Blue L07 successfully attract many fruit powder colleagues in our company.

Write it at the end

After the deep use of Deep Blue L07, it is certain that the intelligent experience of this car has not become a "partial student" because of Huawei’s intelligent driving.

The Deepal OS developed by Deep Blue also brought a good experience to the smart cockpit of this car. It would be better if we could polish the interactive logic of the system in the next OTA.

Finally, I would like to ask the dark blue car owners in front of the screen, are you satisfied with the current experience of Deepal OS? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area for discussion!

　　Cctv newsIn 1999, Zhou and Zheng, who lived in zhouning county, Ningde City, Fujian Province, had an injury dispute. Zhouning county People’s Court ruled that Zheng’s behavior was excessive defense. In 2000, he was sent back for retrial by Ningde Intermediate People’s Court. Subsequently, due to doubts about the injury identification, several levels of people’s procuratorial organs maintained their decision not to prosecute.

　　After 20 years of complaint, Zhou finally ushered in a turning point on October 31st this year, and a special public hearing was held in the Supreme People’s Procuratorate. How did the 20-year case happen? What is the crux of the case? What problems can the hearing solve?

　　This is the hearing scene of a criminal appeal case in Fujian Province on October 31, 2019. Zhou and Zheng are the focus of this hearing. Two people of the same age were completely changed in their lives because of a case that happened nearly 20 years ago. After many years, for the first time, they sat down and solved the problem face to face in this way. What kind of dispute happened in that year? Why did the Supreme People’s Procuratorate hold a hearing of such a scale and handle Zhou’s complaint by public examination? It starts with a dispute that happened in 1999.

　　Zhou helped a friend to discuss that he was hit by Zheng throwing stones.

　　At that time, Zhou and Zheng were both 25 years old, living in zhouning county, Ningde City, Fujian Province, and didn’t know each other. On the evening of December 4, 1999, because of the emotional breakdown with his girlfriend, Zheng went to his girlfriend’s house with his family to deal with the dispute, and had an argument with the social youth Ruan and others present, and then there was a physical conflict.

　　On the other hand, Zou was angry, but at about 9 o’clock that night, he called Zhou and several other friends, a total of more than 10 people, and planned to go to Zheng to discuss it.

　　The photos of the scene in that year showed that there were three floors in Zheng’s building, and scattered bricks could be seen on the ground of the second floor corridor. According to the police’s on-site investigation record, the wall of Zheng’s outer courtyard is 2.6 meters high, and there are traces of climbing and stepping at a distance of 2 meters from the ground. Zheng’s mother recalled that there was more than one person who climbed the wall and tried to break into her house.

　　Zhou said that he did not participate in climbing the wall at that time, but stood outside the door all the time. Seeing bricks falling, he hid in an alley.

　　That night, Zhou was treated in the county hospital and was later identified as seriously injured by the forensic doctor of the county public security bureau. In September 2000, the People’s Procuratorate of zhouning county initiated a public prosecution, accusing the defendant Zheng of intentionally injuring others’ bodies and causing serious injuries, and should be investigated for criminal responsibility for intentional injury.

　　The first instance ruled that Zheng had defended himself when the two appealed.

　　In 2000, the People’s Court of zhouning county made a judgment that Zheng’s behavior was excessive defense and he should compensate Zhou for a loss of more than 15,000 yuan. However, both of them refused to accept the verdict and continued to appeal to the court.

　　The judgment of the first instance of the case shows that more than 10 people, including Zou, gathered Zhou and so on, went to the defendant Zheng’s house at 9: 00 pm, threw bricks and stones into the corridor on the second floor, and climbed the wall to enter, thus committing illegal infringement. Defendant Zheng used bricks to stop and bruise Zhou’s head, which constituted serious injury. His defensive behavior obviously exceeded the necessary limit, which was excessive defense and his behavior constituted intentional injury. However, Zhou thought that he was seriously injured, and the court sentenced the defendant Zheng too low. Zheng insisted that he was a legitimate defense and should not bear criminal responsibility.

　　The case of doubtful evidence appraisal was sent back for retrial.

　　In 2000, the case came to the Intermediate People’s Court of Ningde City. After trial, the court made a decision to "revoke the original judgment and send it back for retrial". There are three reasons: first, some witnesses’ testimonies, on-site investigation photos and other evidence have not been cross-examined in court; Second, the testimony of Xiao, the main witness, was illegal, and the witness did not appear in court. The third reason why the case was sent back for retrial is that Ningde Intermediate People’s Court, after conducting a documentary review of Zhou’s injury appraisal report, considered that the medical evidence that his injury constituted a serious injury was insufficient.

　　At that time, no one thought that these two thin pages of injury identification would affect the direction of the whole case in the future, and even lead to the inability to continue the judicial process. In December 2000, the case was sent back for retrial, and the zhouning county People’s Procuratorate re-collected evidence to supplement it.

　　It is difficult to re-identify the injury with doubtful medical records.　

　　Because the original appraisal conclusion could not be adopted, in September 2001, the People’s Procuratorate of zhouning county entrusted the First Hospital of Ningde City to re-appraise Zhou. However, after reviewing the materials, the hospital believes that "the medical record has legal effect and cannot be supplemented or changed at will afterwards" and "it is difficult to re-identify the injury in view of the doubts in the hospitalized case of the injured person".

　　After receiving the decision of non-prosecution from the county procuratorate, Zhou submitted a complaint to the county procuratorate, the municipal procuratorate and the provincial procuratorate in turn. The results of the review by several procuratorial organs were to maintain the original decision of non-prosecution.

　　The prosecutor in charge believes that Zhou’s criminal complaint case has certain complexity and particularity, and it is necessary to hold a hearing because of the strong professionalism of forensic injury identification.

　　Invite experts and lawyers to publicly hear the case.

　　On October 31, 2019, a public hearing was held in the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, and forensic doctors, lawyers, legal experts and several NPC deputies were invited to attend. Conduct a public hearing on the crux of the case, Zhou’s injury identification.

　　At the hearing, the prosecutor combed the evidence materials with detailed pictures and texts. According to the inspection certificate made by zhouning county Public Security Bureau on December 30, 1999, "Zhou’s head was injured by blunt instrument, and there was a skull base fracture, accompanied by facial and auditory nerve injury and cerebrospinal fluid leakage, as well as epidural hematoma, subdural effusion and parietal bone fracture caused by blunt instrument injury, which constituted serious injuries." It is based on Articles 41 and 44 of the 1990 edition of the Appraisal Standard for Serious Human Injury.

　　Forensic experts believe that in all the medical records of Zhou, there is only a literal diagnosis conclusion of "skull base fracture", and there is no objective medical examination support, so the injury cannot be identified accordingly.

　　What are the flaws in medical record identification and why are the authenticity in doubt?

　　The prosecutor in charge of the case noticed that even the written diagnosis conclusions in the original materials were inconsistent in many places, and it was suspected that there were supplementary changes.

　　In addition to the suspected modification of the medical records, the more critical time of Zhou’s admission and discharge is also inconsistent in many places, and even conflicts with the time of the incident.

　　The transcripts of all the parties and the results of police investigations show that the time of the incident was on the evening of December 4. Why was Zhou’s admission time registered as 11 am on the 4 th in some materials?

　　The undertaker of the original case and the undertaker of the original review case show the evidence, and after the forensic experts express their professional opinions, the hearing officers express their opinions on the facts and evidence of the case.

　　Subsequently, the host announced the adjournment and the hearing officer reviewed the case. Form a hearing comment.

　　On GitHub, a well-known code hosting platform in the programmer circle, someone initiated a project called "996.ICU", which means "Work 996, sick ICU". "996" is the working state of programmers in many enterprises, working from 9 am to 9 pm, working six days a week. This project has been responded by a large number of programmers. Since it was registered on March 26th, the number of Star has exceeded the integer mark of 150,000 by April 2nd, indicating that at least 150,000 programmers have paid attention to this project.

　　At present, this topic has also been extended to other network platforms and continues to ferment. Programmers are not only concerned about the violation of their rights and interests by the "996" working system and the harm to their health and family life, but also worry about their jobs. Although employees go to work in "996", once the enterprise strategy is adjusted or the capital chain is limited, the entire industrial cluster is often abolished, and the jobs may be lost at any time. Even if we work hard in "996", the development of the enterprise is singing all the way. There are many examples of programmers being laid off after reaching the "ceiling age" of 35 years old, which makes them worry about their career future.

　　Faced with this topic, some people will say that since they are not satisfied with "996", they should change their jobs. The problem is that there are dozens of "996" enterprises named by programmers on "996.ICU", among which there are many well-known enterprises in the industry. In other words, even if programmers jump ship and go to different enterprises in different cities, it is still difficult to escape from the clutches of "996". Some enterprises even regard "996" as the so-called corporate culture, and openly ask employees to implement it. At the beginning of this year, there were enterprises that openly asked employees to implement the "996" working system and were investigated by the local labor inspection department.

　　In fact, "996", regarded as a successful experience by individual entrepreneurs, is itself suspected of breaking the law. It is clearly stipulated in the Labor Law that "the state practices a working-hour system in which workers work no more than eight hours a day and 44 hours a week on average." According to the "996" calculation, one hour lunch break is removed every day, and the working hours of employees are as high as 11 hours and 66 hours a week.

　　For overtime, the law stipulates that "generally, it shall not exceed one hour per day", and "it shall not exceed three hours per day and thirty-six hours per month" on the premise of "ensuring the health of workers" for special reasons, and the premise of overtime is "after consultation with trade unions and workers". Then, regardless of whether overtime is negotiated or not, if it is calculated by four weeks per month, the overtime time of "996" is as high as 104 hours per month, which is nearly three times as much as the upper limit stipulated by the state.

　　More crucially, on the one hand, many enterprises regard "996" as chicken soup in the workplace, on the other hand, they not only lack corresponding compensatory time off, but also fail to pay employees overtime pay on weekdays and holidays in full. It is self-evident who will benefit from the "996" working system. At the same time, many enterprises have implemented the invisible "996" working system in order to avoid legal risks, that is, they don’t publicly ask for this working time. However, in actual work, no one dares to leave the company before 9: 00 pm, and no one dares not to work overtime on Saturday, because those who leave work by the hour and those who don’t work overtime are often excluded and criticized in the corresponding evaluation system, and are detained as "not aggressive"

　　As more and more programmers fall into the "996" working system, the relevant departments should do something. We should know that behind programmers’ overtime work, the supporting departments of their enterprises will also work overtime, and these enterprises are powerful enterprises in the industry. In order to adapt to their working hours, employees of business-related enterprises in the upstream and downstream of the industry naturally have to work overtime, leading to the expansion of the "996" working system. (Shu nian)